Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a global score of 82.4, which is better than Moto X Style's global score of 74.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro design is way newer and extremely thinner, but just a little heavier than Moto X Style. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little more vivid display than Moto X Style, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite worse display density, it also counts with a larger screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a greater storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 5020mAh battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a camera with way more mega pixels and a larger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.