Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than Motorola Moto X Style, having a global score of 86.1 against 74.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is somewhat heavier but thinner than Motorola Moto X Style. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a screen that's just as good as Moto X Style's screen, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 2080 x 2400px resolution and a larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more RAM memory and 2 more cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a superior camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.