Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-01 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is slightly better than the Moto X Style, with a global score of 77.1 against 74.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a much thinner but somewhat heavier phone than the Moto X Style. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a little sharper display than Moto X Style, because although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display.
The Moto X Style counts with a very superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has 2 less cores and 3 GB lesser RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a better camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a much more MP camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a superior storage for games and applications than Moto X Style, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.