Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a score of 91.5, which is way better than the Motorola Moto X Style's overall score of 74.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is a newer and much thinner phone than Motorola Moto X Style, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a much better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a very superior camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a much better 200 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger camera aperture and a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.