Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-09-01 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro is a bit better than the Moto X Style, getting a 77.2 score against 74.1. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's construction is a lot newer and way thinner, but a little bit heavier than the Moto X Style. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro and Moto X Style feature very similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a just a bit worse pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a bit better CPU than Moto X Style, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. The Moto X Style has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with much more MP and a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has just a bit bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with greater battery life than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.