Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a global score of 76.6, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 general score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 body is notably newer and noticeably thinner than the Motorola Moto X Style's, but it is heavier. The Moto X Style counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater screen pixels density.
The Moto X Style and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 count with quite similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, both have the same 64 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features a little better processing power than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a way better battery performance than Moto X Style, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera and a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.