Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than Moto X Style, having a overall score of 81.1 against 74.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a way newer and notably thinner device than the Moto X Style, but it is somewhat heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Moto X Style counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a superior camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a much larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.