Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-09-01 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is better than Moto X Style, getting an 83 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T design is way newer and somewhat thinner than Moto X Style's, although it's heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X Style counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a superior camera than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a larger camera aperture, a larger sensor and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a much better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.