Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | iOS 9.x |
| 2015-07-28 | 2015-09-09 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Plastic | Aluminium, Glass and Steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 575.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 750 x 1334 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A9 APL0898 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Twister, 64-bit (Dual-Core 1840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | PowerVR GT7600 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1715mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 240 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 6s has a score of 83, which is much better than the Moto X Style's 73.8 general score. IPhone 6s works with iOS 9.x operating system, and Moto X Style has Android 6.0 operating system. The iPhone 6s design is a lot lighter and noticeably thinner than Moto X Style, although both of them were released only a few months apart.
The iPhone 6s has a superior processor than Moto X Style, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores, a 64 bits processor and a GPU. Moto X Style has a little sharper display than iPhone 6s, because it has a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution, a much higher pixel density and a bigger display.
The Apple iPhone 6s features a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Moto X Style counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 6s, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 1715mAh.
The Moto X Style features a little bit better camera than iPhone 6s, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Style also has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photos.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Apple iPhone 6s is also cheaper than the Moto X Style.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.