Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-28 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than the Moto X Style's global score of 73.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL body is extremely newer and incredibly thinner than the Moto X Style's, although it's a little heavier. Moto X Style counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it has a bit worse screen density, a quite lower 2560 x 1440px resolution and a bit smaller display.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a more powerful processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Moto X Style features a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto X Style also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 128 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has just a little better battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has a 3430mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Motorola Moto X Style captures a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.