Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-07-28 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Motorola Moto X Style, having an 81 score against 73.8. The LG G7 ThinQ construction is a lot newer, incredibly thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto X Style. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Moto X Style has Android 6.0, so it gives you a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
LG G7 ThinQ has a quite better hardware performance than Moto X Style, because it has 1 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a little bit larger screen, a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a quite greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto X Style and LG G7 ThinQ both feature really similar cameras, because although the LG G7 ThinQ has a way less megapixels back-facing camera, a way tinier sensor taking way lower quality photographs and videos and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video.
The Moto X Style and the LG G7 ThinQ feature extremely similar batteries performance.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.