Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | Android 11 |
| 2015-07-28 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style's overall score of 73.8. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Nokia XR20 has newer 11 version and Motorola Moto X Style has Android 6.0 version, providing some extra features. Nokia XR20 is a way newer and just a little thinner phone than Motorola Moto X Style, although it's also a lot heavier.
The Nokia XR20 features a more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The Moto X Style has a better display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Nokia XR20 features a bit better camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has higher video frame rates, a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger aperture and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
Nokia XR20 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Moto X Style, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a really longer battery life than Moto X Style, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia XR20 is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.