Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-07-28 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto X Style's global score of 73.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has a more recent 10 version while Motorola Moto X Style has Android 6.0. Nubia Red Magic 5S is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto X Style, although it's somewhat heavier.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a better performance than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto X Style features a much better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better camera than Moto X Style, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, nubia Red Magic 5S is also cheaper than the Moto X Style, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.