Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-07-28 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than the Moto X Style, having a general score of 80.4 against 73.8. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's design is newer, just a little bit lighter and incredibly thinner than the Moto X Style. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a more powerful processor than Moto X Style, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Moto X Style has a slightly better display than Galaxy Note Fan Edition. They have a same size display, the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and the same display pixel density. The Motorola Moto X Style has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little more expensive than the Motorola Moto X Style, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.