Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 6.0, 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-07-28 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 599.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A57 (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Moto X Style's 73.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is way newer and thinner than Moto X Style's, although it's heavier. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version and Moto X Style has Android 6.0.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Motorola Moto X Style counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel density.
Motorola Moto X Style takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a much better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X Style, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.