Compare phones
Motorola Moto X
VerizonXT1060
| Global Score | |
| 68.1 | 74.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-08-01 | 2019-04-10 |
| 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White | Black,Deep blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 175.00 | $ 166.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20 is slightly better than Moto X, having a general score of 74.7 against 68.1. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A20 is incredibly heavier than the Moto X, it's thinner and also notably newer. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A20 has an older 11 version while Moto X has Android 4.4.4.
Galaxy A20 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto X, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and 1 GB more RAM. The Moto X features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A20, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1280 x 720px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Galaxy A20 features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A20's camera is very similar to the Moto X one, because although the Galaxy A20 has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture and a lot more MP camera.
The Galaxy A20 counts with a much longer battery life than Moto X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2200mAh.
The Galaxy A20 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.