Compare phones
Motorola Moto X
VerizonXT1060
| Global Score | |
| 68.1 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2013-08-01 | 2018-07-13 |
| 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White | Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 312 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy J7 Star has a general score of 73.1, which is a little bit better than the Moto X's score of 68.1. The Galaxy J7 Star body is extremely newer and thinner than Moto X's, although it's also incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy J7 Star has newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto X has Android 4.4.4, so it gives lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto X, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, and they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star also counts with 6 more cores. The Moto X has a much better screen than Galaxy J7 Star, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1280 x 720 resolution, the Moto X also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy J7 Star counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Moto X, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB and 16 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X, because although it has slower video frame rate and a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star also counts with a way higher 13 megapixels resolution camera and a way larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star has a really longer battery duration than Moto X, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.