Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Moto X4, getting an 85.3 score against 74.4. The iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is newer than the Moto X4's, but it is noticeably heavier and a bit thicker. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a larger display.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a greater performance than Moto X4, because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto X4 has a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, a back-facing camera with a 12 MP and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has higher video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto X4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy iPhone 11 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto X4, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.