Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than Motorola Moto X4, getting an 82 score against 74.4. Although iPhone XR is newer than Motorola Moto X4, it's heavier and a little thicker. IPhone XR features a display that is very similar to the Moto X4 one, because although the iPhone XR has a bit worse pixel count in each inch of screen and a little bit lower 828 x 1792 pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger display.
Moto X4 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. IPhone XR features a quite better performance than Moto X4, because although it has 2 less processing cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 MP, a same size camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone XR also has better video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture.
Apple iPhone XR and Moto X4 feature extremely similar batteries, although the Apple iPhone XR has a 2 percent lower battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto X4. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto X4, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.