Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto X4, having an 80.2 score against 74.4. Although Google Pixel is older and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto X4, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Google Pixel has a display that's very similar to the screen in Moto X4, because although the Google Pixel has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount in each inch of display.
Moto X4 counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster). The Moto X4 counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Motorola Moto X4, and although the Google Pixel has a larger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with more megapixels, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition and a F2 diafragm aperture.
The Moto X4 features just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
Google Pixel costs a bit more than the Moto X4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.