Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is better than Moto X4, having a general score of 82.5 against 74.4. Google Pixel 2 XL's body has the same thickness than the Moto X4, but it's just a bit heavier. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little better processing power than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a greater display density and a larger screen. The Motorola Moto X4 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a camera that is very similar to the camera in Moto X4, because although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, it also counts with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video.
Google Pixel 2 XL has improved battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.