Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than Motorola Moto X4, getting an 80 score against 74.4. The Google Pixel 3 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Motorola Moto X4, but both are 0.31inches thick. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little sharper screen than Moto X4, because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite higher pixel density. The Moto X4 has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Moto X4 features a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3% larger battery capacity. The Moto X4 and the Google Pixel 3 both count with extremely similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a higher 12.2 MP resolution camera, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video resolution and a same size sensor.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.