Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is much better than Moto X4's 74.4 score. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is just a little thicker than Moto X4, it's a little bit lighter and also noticeably newer. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a bit greater pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a quite larger screen.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better processor than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4's camera is just as good as the Moto X4 one, and although the Google Pixel 4 has a more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light photos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same camera sensor size and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Moto X4 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto X4 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 is more expensive than the Moto X4, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.