Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Motorola Moto X4, having an 82.9 score against 74.4. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is a lot newer, but a bit thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto X4. Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better screen than Moto X4, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a bigger screen and a higher screen density.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a little bit better performance than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Moto X4 has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL's camera is just as good as the camera in Moto X4, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates and a 0.39 inches sensor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs a lot more than the Moto X4, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.