Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-04-11 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is much better than Motorola Moto X4, having a overall score of 84.3 against 74.4. The LG G8 ThinQ body is newer, but a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the Motorola Moto X4. LG G8 ThinQ features a bit better processor than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG G8 ThinQ has a much better looking display than Moto X4, because it has a greater pixel amount per screen inch, a larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG G8 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Moto X4, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality photos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, the LG G8 ThinQ also counts with higher video frame rates and a much larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
The LG G8 ThinQ has much more storage for applications and games than Moto X4, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG G8 ThinQ has just a bit longer battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 17% bigger battery size.
The LG G8 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.