Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is better than the Moto X4, having a global score of 82.7 against 74.4. LG G8X ThinQ's body is much newer, but a little thicker and heavier than Moto X4. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
Moto X4 and LG G8X ThinQ both count with extremely similar screens, because although the LG G8X ThinQ has a just a bit lower pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a larger screen. The LG G8X ThinQ captures clearer photographs and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels and a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the LG G8X ThinQ also has higher video frame rate and a larger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments.
The LG G8X ThinQ features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG G8X ThinQ has greater battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.