Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is better than the Moto X4's score of 74.4. LG K92 is a newer cellphone than Moto X4, but it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The Moto X4 counts with a slightly better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixel density.
LG K92 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has more internal storage. LG K92 counts with a CPU that's very similar to the Motorola Moto X4 one, and although the LG K92 has more RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG K92 has improved battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The LG K92 shoots much better pictures and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG K92 also has a way bigger sensor, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
LG K92 is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto X4, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.