Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 has a global score of 76.7, which is just a bit better than the Moto X4's global score of 74.4. The LG Stylo 6 design is way newer than Moto X4's, although it's a bit thicker and much heavier. LG Stylo 6 features a bit better processing unit than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Stylo 6 also has more RAM.
The Motorola Moto X4 features a bit sharper display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels quantity in each inch in the display. LG Stylo 6 has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X4, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Stylo 6 also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto X4 captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a less MP back-facing camera and a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger back camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures. The LG Stylo 6 has superior battery performance than Moto X4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The LG Stylo 6 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.