Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.3 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto X4, with a 78.6 score against 74.4. LG V10 is a better phone than the Motorola Moto X4, we must note that it is also a way older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone. LG V10 has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a little bit larger display, a just a little better pixels quantity per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Moto X4 counts with a superior processor than LG V10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The LG V10 has a slightly better camera than Moto X4, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light captures, higher 120 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
LG V10 counts with a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto X4, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V10 also has 64 GB internal memory. The LG V10 features a battery life that's very similar to the Motorola Moto X4 one.
The LG V10 costs a bit more than the Moto X4, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.