Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is much better than Motorola Moto X4, having a score of 82.5 against 74.4. LG V30S ThinQ's body is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto X4, even though they were only released 5 months apart. LG V30S ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a higher pixels density and a bigger display. The LG V30S ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a way more megapixels back camera and a larger aperture.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a way bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V30S ThinQ features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 10% greater battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto X4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Moto X4, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.