Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is better than the Moto X4's global score of 74.4. LG V60 ThinQ is a much newer device than the Moto X4, but it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto X4 features a bit more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way higher video resolution and a larger aperture.
LG V60 ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 96 GB more internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is more expensive than Moto X4, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.