Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Microsoft |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-09-20 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a score of 85.3, which is better than the Motorola Moto X4's 74.4 score. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is much newer and notably thinner, but way heavier than the Motorola Moto X4. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit better processing unit than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a slightly better display than Moto X4, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels and a lot bigger display. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution back facing camera, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto X4, because it has a 4449mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 costs a lot more than the Moto X4, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.