Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Motorola Moto X4, with a score of 87.1 against 74.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is a lot newer than the Motorola Moto X4's, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better screen than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen.
Moto X4 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, faster video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Moto X4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.