Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto X4's 74.4 score. Motorola Moto Z Force's body weights the same than the Motorola Moto X4, but it is just a bit thinner. The Motorola Moto X4 features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a greater number of 2.2 GHz cores.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a higher pixel number in each screen inch, a bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Moto Z Force counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X4, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the Moto Z Force also has 64 GB internal memory.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
The Moto Z Force counts with a little better battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
The Moto Z Force is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Moto X4, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.