Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Motorola Moto X4, getting a global score of 87 against 74.4. Motorola razr (2020) is a heavier phone than Motorola Moto X4, but both of them have the same thickness. Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior processing unit than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto X4 has a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 1920px resolution. Motorola razr (2020) has a bit more memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Moto X4 counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. Motorola razr (2020) shoots much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto X4. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto X4, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.