Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a bit better than Moto X4, with an 80.3 score against 74.4. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is newer than the Moto X4's, although it is thicker and way heavier. Moto X4 has a little more vivid display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better display density.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW takes a lot better photos and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos, higher video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto X4. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto X4, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.