Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView has a global score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X4's 74.4 overall score. The Nokia 9 PureView is a just a bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Moto X4, but both of them are equally thin. The Nokia 9 PureView features just a bit better looking display than Moto X4, because it has a larger display, a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto X4 has a little bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have a 12 mega pixels back camera, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto X4 also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto X4, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto X4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Nokia 9 PureView, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto X4, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.