Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S is just a bit better than the Moto X4, with a score of 75.8 against 74.4. Nubia Red Magic 3S's design is newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto X4. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto X4, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto X4 features a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S has slightly more storage for games and applications than Moto X4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery performance than Moto X4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes greater photos and videos than Moto X4, because it has a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Although nubia Red Magic 3S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto X4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy nubia Red Magic 3S, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto X4, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.