Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a general score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than the Moto X4's 74.4 score. Even though the nubia Red Magic 5S is newer than the Moto X4, it is thicker and heavier. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bigger screen. Moto X4 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures way better photographs and videos than Moto X4, because it has a way higher video definition, a way larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto X4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto X4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, else you can save some dollars and buy the Moto X4, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.