Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | -- |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A16 5G has a global score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than Moto X4's overall score of 74.4. Galaxy A16 5G is a heavier cellphone than Moto X4, but both of them have the same thickness. The Motorola Moto X4 has a really superior performance than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A16 5G has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display. Moto X4 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X4, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A16 5G features a really longer battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.