Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A20s has a general score of 77, which is slightly better than Moto X4's score of 74.4. Galaxy A20s's design has the same thickness than the Moto X4, but it is heavier. The Moto X4 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A20s, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Moto X4 features a much better screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a much higher screen pixels density. Motorola Moto X4 takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a lesser mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Moto X4 features just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A20s, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A20s has longer battery duration than Moto X4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.