Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A21s has a global score of 77.7, which is a bit better than Moto X4's overall score of 74.4. Samsung Galaxy A21s's body is extremely newer, but heavier and thicker than the Moto X4. Moto X4 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a lot higher screen density.
The Moto X4 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto X4 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto X4 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A21s. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 3 GB of RAM.
Galaxy A21s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto X4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A21s takes much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.