Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto X4, getting a score of 84.6 against 74.4. The Galaxy A22 5G body is much newer than the Motorola Moto X4's, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto X4 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A22 5G and Moto X4 feature similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A22 5G has more RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light situations and a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy A22 5G has a much better battery performance than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 67 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.