Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is slightly better than Moto X4's 74.4 overall score. The Galaxy A25 5G design is noticeably newer than the Moto X4's, but it is heavier and a little thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better screen than Moto X4, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Motorola Moto X4 has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a superior camera than Moto X4, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G features a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.