Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Moto X4's 74.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A31 construction is noticeably newer than Moto X4's, but it's a little thicker and heavier. The Motorola Moto X4 has a little better performance than Galaxy A31, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Moto X4 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density. The Moto X4 has a bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A31 features a much better battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy A31 captures better pictures and videos than Moto X4, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A31 also has a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.