Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X4, getting a 79.4 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's construction is newer than Motorola Moto X4's, but it is just a little thicker and way heavier. Galaxy A35 5G has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a just a little worse pixels number per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Motorola Moto X4 features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a bigger aperture, a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The Motorola Moto X4 features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola Moto X4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.