Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than the Moto X4's global score of 74.4. Although the Galaxy A50 is a little bit heavier than the Moto X4, it's a little thinner and newer. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has more RAM.
The Motorola Moto X4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Moto X4, because although it has a smaller sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with improved battery duration than Motorola Moto X4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.