Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto X4, getting a 90.7 score against 74.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy A52 is incredibly newer than Motorola Moto X4, it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Moto X4 features a little sharper display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a way more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images.
The Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A52 features a superior battery life than Moto X4, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.