Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is a lot better than Moto X4's 74.4 general score. Galaxy A52 5G is a newer phone than the Moto X4, but it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Moto X4 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a little higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a little faster processor than Moto X4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 3 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X4, because although it has an external memory slot that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy A52 5G has a way better battery life than Moto X4, because it has a 50 percent more battery size. Galaxy A52 5G has a way better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger aperture, a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.