Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.84 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is a lot better than the Moto X4's general score of 74.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A52s is extremely newer than Moto X4, it's heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A52s features just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has more RAM.
The Moto X4 features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density. Galaxy A52s has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X4, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy A52s has a way better camera than Moto X4, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and videos.
Galaxy A52s features a much better battery performance than Moto X4, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.